SECTION 650:15-1-10. Review process

(a)   Peer review. Applications for funding shall be reviewed and ranked by a panel (COE Review Panel) of out-of-state reviewers recommended by the COEC and approved by the OSTRaD Board.

(1)   The COE Review Panel will assist the COEC and the OCAST staff in selecting and obtaining appropriate peer reviewers to review each submitted application for scientific merit.

(2)   The COE Review Panel will assist the COEC and the OCAST staff in selecting and obtaining appropriate peer reviewers to review each submitted application for potential economic impact.

(3)   The COE Review Panel shall make site visits to the Center facilities of each of the finalist applicants and rank those applications approved for funding.

(b)   Evaluation criteria. All applications shall be reviewed and ranked according to evaluation criteria listed in the solicitation.

[Source: Amended at 19 Ok Reg 3080, eff 9-9-02 through 7-14-03 (emergency); Amended at 20 Ok Reg 2734, eff 8-11-03]

Note

EDITOR’S NOTE: This emergency action expired before being superseded by a permanent action. Upon expiration of an emergency amendatory action, the last prior permanent text is reinstated. Therefore, on 7-15-03 (after the 7-14-03 expiration of the emergency action), the text of Section 650:15-1-10 reverted back to the permanent text that was effective prior to enactment of the emergency action on 9-9-02, as was last published in the 2001 Edition of the OAC, and remained as such until amended by permanent action on 8-11-03.